To Friends and Enemies:
Spread the word and take action.
Feel free to copy and paste any and all of this.
On being sentence this insulting and upsetting notice I was not given a link to challenge the false attack on me so in anyone has it please send me the link. Thank you, S
Please write: firstname.lastname@example.org
and ask them to restore my YouTube
Ask them to stop the censorship and the false attack on my freedom of speech they call bullying.
I was talking about Tacopina being a bully -- how ironic I get flagged and it is about censorship yet again.....remember my entire YouTube channel was removed...see Wiki page that also was removed at the bottom of this post on Google Censorship.
Where is Baby Lisa? I want to know. I point out there is another Baby Lisa -- a baby that came to be mentioned in Tacopina Seigel NYPD rape trial but this baby Lisa was beaten to death age 4. See testimony below as published in The NY Post. What was so threatening about this YouTube it was removed?
Joe Tacopina 2 Baby Lisas Misoygist Lawyer Face Time Addict? - (Suzannahartist)
My YouTube was removed for wrongly being accused of bullying. I am not bullying anyone but I am expressing my opinions and that is my first amendment right.
YouTube encourages a get on your soap box free forum and has Neo-Nazi groups flourishing but I am not allowed my 1st amendment right and my opinions?
I want to know where is Baby Lisa? Where is Natalee Holloway's body.
In my opinion Joe Tacopina is spread to thin to devote his full energies to finding Baby Lisa and he is addicted to face time.
I point out there are 2 Baby Lisa's in Joe Tacpoina's life.
Joe Tacopina and Chad Seigel used Dr. Essing as their medical expert to refute that NYPD Rape Cop Moreno his victim and the medical doctor they chose handed over Baby Lisa -- the original Baby Lisa to Joel Steinberg who beat her to death at age 6! That was Tacopina’s medical expert -- a real sensitive medical doctor when it comes to women and babies...a very special baby -- Baby Lisa. I asked in the YouTube to ask your MD’s if they would hand over a baby to anyone - let alone a lawyer without paper work?
"My understanding was that this was the grandmother, [Steinberg] was a lawyer, and that it was legal," Essig said.
Seventeen months after the hand-off, Steinberg would be charged with murder for the bludgeoning death of his six-year-old daughter, Lisa, who was also adopted without court approvals. The baby boy was given back to his birth family
"No, I did not provide him any paperwork," Essig told the prosecutor of delivering the baby boy to Steinberg.
"You just provided the baby?" Balbert snapped. A defense objection was sustained.
"Were you ever charged with anything?" defense lawyer Chad Seigel asked Essig on re-direct testimony, pointing out to jurors that the incident happened 25 years ago.
"No I was not," the doctor answered.
"Never," the doctor answered.
Essig had been called by the defense to counter the only rape forensics being offered by prosecutors: a small bruise on the alleged victim's cervix, the location of which a prosecution expert said was consistent with her account of being violated while lying on her stomach.
Essig, who has his own practice in Manhattan and is a adjunct professor at NYU, told jurors that the bruise could have easily been caused by an emergency room examination instrument, or during a manual examination, or be explained away by bacterial or viral conditions. Besides, he testified, the so-called bruise was "tiny, almost microscopic."
"This is a normal cervix," he told jurors, pointing to the prosecution's blown-up version of an exam photograph, displayed on a wide-screen TV.
But Essig also admitted on cross that he had never himself done a sexual assault assessment exam -- the kind performed on the alleged victim after the incident."
Remember Joe Tacopina was defending van der Sloot and van der Sloot went out and killed another young woman?
van der Sloot contacted Natalee's Mom and offered to give her information on Natalee's body?
Tacopina and Seigel's strategy in the NYPD rape cop trial was to compare the Rape Victim's genitals and all women's genitals to a Venus Fly Trap. Chad Seigel from Tacopina Seigel working with Joe Tacopina defending NYPD Rape Cop Moreno compares women's genitals to a fly trap in question form.
I filed a grievance with the Supreme Court suggesting this was a hate crime.
Why can't I express my opinions about a bully like Joe Tacopina who in my opinion is a bully in and out of court without having my YouTube removed and how laughable for allegedly bully.
The Supreme Court committee agreed with Judge Greg Carro that Seigel's comment was rude as I recall.
Joe Tacopina and Chad Seigel put NYPD Rape Cop Ken Moreno's Victim on trial.
Read the NYPD rape victim's own words at her treatment by Joe Tacopina in court.
As I said in my YouTube that was wrongly removed if only Joe Tacopina could have to live it for 24 hours the way he treats women in court.
Where is Baby Lisa?
I ask this question and my YouTube comes down.
The YouTube is about 2 Baby Lisa's
Joe Tacopina wanted the NYPD rape victim silenced at the sentencing of NYPD rape cop Moreno as reported by The Gothamist.
"...attorneys for the two former NYPD officers accused of raping an East Village woman are arguing that their accuser should not be able to speak at the cops' sentencing on August 8. "She is not a victim on any count of conviction," Joseph Tacopina told the Times, "She's had her day. She's spoken before the jury." Tacopina refers to the charges of "official misconduct" that they were convicted of, and because she is not a "victim" of the charge, should not be able to make a victim impact statement."
Joe Tacopina is listed in this article as the devil's advocate and the most hated lawyer and I am not allowed to express my opinions on why he is hated? One big one is how he treats women in court and has no respect for them and blames them for being a victim!
I believe rapes are up in NYC and under reported and his and his partner's behavior in court has something to do with why women don't want to come forward and be raped again.
Why am I being silenced?
Is this misogyny on YouTube Google's behalf as well as violating my right to my opinions.
If they don't like why tune in?
Suzannah B. Troy